Passed Over for a Promised Promotion and Told to Report to a Rival: Have I Resigned If I Say I Can't Work for Them? An Ontario Executive's Guide

Have I resigned if I say I cannot work for the person they want me to report to?

If that is all you said, almost certainly not. A resignation must be clear and unequivocal, the rule the Court of Appeal for Ontario confirmed in Kieran v. Ingram Micro Inc., 2004 CanLII 4852 (ON CA). The test is objective. Would a reasonable person who knew everything happening in that room understand that you had actually decided to end your employment?

You were told you must report to a rival who has just been given the job you were promised, and you said you cannot work for them. That is a reaction to a proposed change. It does not say when you are leaving or that you are leaving at all, and it depends on a transfer your employer still controls. A statement like "if you put me under her, I can't stay" is a warning or a negotiating position. It is not a present, settled decision to quit.

At your level, this question matters because "resignation" is the word that switches off almost every part of your package. Here is what depends on it:

• The protections in s. 54 of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) arise only when the employer "terminates" your employment. A true voluntary resignation gives you no statutory notice and no statutory severance pay.
• Common law reasonable notice, which for a senior executive can run well past a year, is owed only when the employer ends the relationship, either expressly or constructively.
• Most bonus, RSU, PSU, option and deferred compensation plans treat a voluntary resignation as a "bad leaver" event that forfeits everything unvested.
• Retention and sign-on bonus agreements often require you to repay the money if you resign within a set period.
• Some pension and SERP (supplementary executive retirement plan) documents give early retirement subsidies or bridge benefits on a without-cause termination but not on a resignation.

Your employer knows this too. An executive it can record as having resigned is far cheaper to lose than one who was demoted out of the business. That is why the next few conversations, and especially the emails, need care.

What makes a resignation clear and unequivocal?

A resignation is clear and unequivocal when your words or conduct, viewed objectively and in context, show a settled intention to end the employment. Both parts matter. Words spoken in shock minutes after you learn of a demotion are read in light of that shock, and what you do afterwards can confirm or contradict what you said.

Courts look at the whole picture rather than a single sentence. These factors usually carry weight:

• Whether the statement was written, signed and dated, or blurted out in a tense meeting.
• Whether it named a last day or an effective date.
• Whether it depended on something the employer had not yet done, such as finalizing the new reporting line.
• What you did next. Did you come in the next morning, attend meetings, keep approving budgets and logging in? Or did you clear your office and send a farewell note?
• Whether your employer gave you time to reflect or seized on your words immediately.
• Whether the employer drafted the "resignation letter" and put it in front of you to sign.

What happens if my employer says it "accepts my resignation"?

Your employer cannot turn an objection into a resignation by accepting it. Suppose you did not clearly and unequivocally resign, but your employer treats you as gone anyway: it cuts your system access, announces your departure or stops your pay. Then the employer has ended your employment. That is a dismissal without notice, with all the consequences that follow.

The ESA says this directly. Under s. 56(1)(a), an employer terminates employment if it "dismisses the employee or otherwise refuses or is unable to continue employing him or her." An employer that insists you resigned when you did not is refusing to continue employing you, and s. 63(1)(a) uses the same words for severance. Section 54 then says no employer shall terminate an employee with three months or more of service unless it "(a) has given to the employee written notice of termination in accordance with section 57 or 58 and the notice has expired; or (b) has complied with section 61." An employer that believes you quit has done neither.

Section 57 sets the minimum written notice by length of employment:

• (a) at least one week if your period of employment is less than one year;
• (b) at least two weeks for one year or more and fewer than three;
• (c) at least three weeks for three years or more and fewer than four;
• (d) at least four weeks for four years or more and fewer than five;
• (e) at least five weeks for five years or more and fewer than six;
• (f) at least six weeks for six years or more and fewer than seven;
• (g) at least seven weeks for seven years or more and fewer than eight; and
• (h) at least eight weeks for eight years or more.

For an executive, those numbers are the floor, not the measure. The bigger consequence is under your contracts. If the employer ended the relationship, your plans must treat your exit as a termination by the employer, not a resignation, and every good leaver, vesting and bonus clause has to be read that way. An employer that invents a resignation to strip unvested awards also invites a claim that it acted in bad faith in how it dismissed you. Honda Canada Inc. v. Keays, 2008 SCC 39 confirms that damages are available when an employer is untruthful, misleading or unduly insensitive in the way it dismisses someone and the employee proves harm caused by that conduct. See bad faith dismissal damages and forced resignation.

Can I take back words that sounded like a resignation?

Usually yes, if you act before your employer has relied on those words to its detriment. Even a genuine resignation can generally be withdrawn until the employer has changed its position because of it. Examples include hiring or promoting your replacement, announcing your exit to clients or the market, or committing to a restructuring that assumes you are gone.

The practical lesson is speed. A same-day email withdrawing anything that could be read as a resignation leaves little room for reliance. Two weeks of silence while the company tells your team you are leaving leaves a lot. An internal reply of "noted, thanks" is weak evidence of reliance; a signed offer to an outside replacement is much stronger.

If you said something in the meeting that you now regret, write that evening. Say you did not intend to resign, that you were reacting to news of a change you do not accept, and that you remain ready and willing to do your job. Then keep showing up and doing it. For more on words spoken in anger, see taking back a heat-of-the-moment resignation.

Is being passed over for a promised promotion and told to report to a rival a constructive dismissal?

Losing the promotion alone usually is not. Being pushed down the hierarchy under a rival may be. Few employees have a contractual right to a future job, so a broken promise of advancement is normally a disappointment rather than a breach. The stronger claim usually rests on what happened to the role you already hold: a reporting line, title, scope or pay package that has been substantially reduced.

The Supreme Court of Canada set out two ways to prove constructive dismissal in Potter v. New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 2015 SCC 10:

• The first branch is a single one-sided change. You must identify an express or implied term of the contract that the employer broke, then show that the breach substantially changed an essential term. The question is whether a reasonable person in your situation would have felt the essential terms were being substantially changed.
• The second branch is a course of conduct. You do not need to point to one specific term if the employer's conduct, taken as a whole, shows it no longer intends to be bound by the contract.

The standard is objective. In Farber v. Royal Trust Co., [1997] 1 SCR 846, the Supreme Court held that the question is not how the employee felt. It is whether a reasonable person in the same situation would have concluded that the essential terms had been substantially changed. Your personal history with the rival matters only if it shows objective facts, such as a loss of authority, or forms part of a pattern under the second branch.

For a senior manager or executive, these facts tend to decide whether a new reporting line is a substantial change:

• Who you reported to before (for example, the CEO or a divisional head) and who you report to now.
• Whether the new boss was your peer, your junior, or someone outside your function.
• Your title, and whether it changed or merely stayed the same while the role beneath it shrank.
• Your direct reports, budget authority, signing authority, and seat on the executive or leadership committee.
• Access to the board, clients and investors that was part of the role.
• Your base salary, bonus target percentage, LTIP tier or grant size, and any perquisites.

The promotion promise itself can matter in three ways. First, it may have been specific and part of your bargain, for example a retention letter promising the VP role on a set date if you stayed through an integration. Breaking that promise is a breach of contract that supports the first branch. Second, if the promise was made to recruit you and stated as fact, it may support a negligent misrepresentation claim of the kind recognized in Queen v. Cognos Inc., [1993] 1 SCR 87. Third, if the promise lured you away from secure employment, that inducement can lengthen your notice period, as it did in Egan v. Alcatel Canada Inc., 2006 CanLII 108 (ON CA). See also title, reporting line and bonus target changes and our general guide to constructive dismissal.

Does the ESA treat a constructive dismissal as a termination?

Yes, but only if you resign in response within a reasonable period. Under s. 56(1)(b), an employer terminates employment if it "constructively dismisses the employee and the employee resigns from his or her employment in response to that within a reasonable period." Working under the rival for months before you act can cost you the statutory claim.

If your employer is a bank, airline, telecommunications carrier or other federally regulated business, none of the ESA sections in this article apply, because different federal rules govern. See federally regulated employee rights. For provincially regulated employers, here is every limb of s. 56:

• s. 56(1)(a): the employer "dismisses the employee or otherwise refuses or is unable to continue employing him or her." This limb applies if your employer treats your objection as a resignation.
• s. 56(1)(b): a constructive dismissal followed by a resignation "in response to that within a reasonable period." This limb applies if you treat the demotion as the employer breaking the contract and accept that.
• s. 56(1)(c): a lay-off "for a period longer than the period of a temporary lay-off." This does not apply to an executive who is still paid in full, for the reasons below.
• s. 56(2) defines a temporary lay-off in four limbs. (a) Not more than 13 weeks in any 20 consecutive weeks. (b) More than 13 weeks in 20 but less than 35 weeks in 52, if one of these applies: (i) the employee keeps receiving substantial payments; (ii) the employer keeps paying into a legitimate pension or group insurance plan; (iii) the employee receives supplementary unemployment benefits; (iv) the employee works elsewhere and would otherwise qualify for those benefits; (v) the employer recalls the employee within a time the Director approves; or (vi) for a non-union employee, the employer recalls the employee within a time the two of them agreed. (c) For a unionized employee, 35 or more weeks in 52 with recall within a time agreed with the union. (d) For a non-union employee, 35 or more weeks in 52 but less than 52 weeks in 78, where the employer recalls within an agreed time and has the Director's approval for an extended lay-off.
• s. 56(3) defines an "excluded week": a week in which, for one or more days, the employee is not able to work, is not available for work, is on disciplinary suspension, or is not given work because of a strike or lock-out.
• s. 56(3.1) and (3.2): an employee with a regular work week is laid off for a week if they earn "less than one-half" of what they would earn at their regular rate and the week is not an excluded week. Excluded weeks still count toward the 20, 52 and 78-week windows.
• s. 56(3.3) to (3.8): matching tests for employees without a regular work week. They compare weekly earnings with the average of the 12 weeks before the 20, 52 or 78-week window, leaving excluded weeks out of both the count and the average.
• s. 56(4): a lay-off with no recall date is not a termination unless it lasts longer than a temporary lay-off.
• s. 56(5): a termination under clause (1)(c) is deemed to happen on the first day of the lay-off.

None of the lay-off limbs fits the usual reorganization. A salaried executive who keeps full pay is not earning "less than one-half" of regular earnings in any week. Those limbs matter only if the restructuring also cuts your earnings below that line, which would be a strong constructive dismissal in its own right.

Am I owed ESA severance pay as well as notice?

If you have five or more years of service and your employer's payroll is $2.5 million or more, very likely yes. Section 63(1)(b) treats a constructive dismissal followed by a resignation "in response within a reasonable period" as a severance. Section 64(1) then requires severance pay for employees who meet the service and payroll tests.

Here is every limb of s. 63(1):

• (a) The employer dismisses you, or refuses or is unable to continue employing you. This applies if your objection is treated as a resignation.
• (b) A constructive dismissal, and you resign in response within a reasonable period. This applies if you treat the demotion as the employer breaking the contract.
• (c) A lay-off of 35 or more weeks in any 52 consecutive weeks, or a lay-off that runs past the end of an extended lay-off the Director approved. This does not apply while you are paid in full. Sections 63(2) to (2.4) use a "less than one-quarter" earnings test, with the same excluded week rules and 12-week averaging for people without a regular work week, measured over 52 or 78-week windows.
• (d) A lay-off because the employer permanently closes all of its business at an establishment. This does not apply to a reporting line change.
• (e) The employer gives you notice of termination, you give "written notice at least two weeks before resigning," and your resignation takes effect during the statutory notice period. This matters if your employer answers your objection with working notice and you land a new role before it ends. Section 63(3) deems the severance to happen on the day the employer's notice would have taken effect, and s. 65(3) leaves the gap out of the severance calculation.

Section 64 then decides whether you qualify:

• s. 64(1) requires five or more years of employment and either (a) a permanent closure of all or part of the business at an establishment in which 50 or more employees lose their jobs within six months, or (b) a payroll of $2.5 million or more. Limb (a) will rarely fit a demotion. Limb (b) will fit most employers large enough to have a senior leadership team, but check.
• s. 64(2) says the payroll test is met if either (a) total wages for all employees in the four weeks ending with the last completed pay period before the severance, multiplied by 13, reach $2.5 million, or (b) total wages in the employer's last or second-last fiscal year before the severance reach $2.5 million.
• s. 64(3) excludes "prescribed employees." Those categories are set by regulation, so confirm that none applies to you.
• s. 64(4) treats a single location as an establishment if all three conditions are met: there is a permanent closure there, the location is part of an establishment with two or more locations, and 50 or more employees lose their jobs within six months as a result. A single executive's demotion does not trigger it.

Section 65 sets the amount:

• s. 65(1): your regular wages for a regular work week, multiplied by (a) your completed years of employment plus (b) any additional completed months divided by 12.
• s. 65(2): all your time with the employer counts, "whether or not continuous and whether or not active."
• s. 65(2.1): if you are receiving an actuarially unreduced pension benefit, the service credited toward that pension is left out. Executives already drawing an unreduced defined benefit pension from the same employer should check this first.
• s. 65(3): for a severance under s. 63(1)(e), the time between your resignation and the end of the employer's notice is not counted.
• s. 65(4): if the employer did not give the notice it owed, severance is calculated as if you had kept working through that notice period. This can add a completed month.
• s. 65(5): severance pay is capped at 26 weeks of regular wages.
• s. 65(6): if you have no regular work week or are not paid by time, your regular weekly wage is the average over the 12 weeks before the severance (or before the lay-off began, for a severance under s. 63(1)(c) or (d)).
• s. 65(7): subject to subsection (8), severance pay is "in addition to any other amount" owed to you under the Act or your contract.
• s. 65(8): only three deductions are allowed: (1) supplementary unemployment benefits you receive after the severance and before severance pay is due; (2) a payment for loss of employment under your contract that is based on length of employment, service or seniority; and (3) severance already paid under the Act, an earlier version of it, or such a contract term.

Section 65 measures severance in "regular wages for a regular work week." Whether bonus and incentive pay count depends on definitions not covered here, so the example below uses base salary alone for the statutory figures. See termination pay vs severance pay.

Should I resign, work under protest, or accept the new reporting line?

You have three options, and each carries a different risk. Wronko v. Western Inventory Service Ltd., 2008 ONCA 327 describes them: accept the change, reject it and treat yourself as constructively dismissed, or reject it clearly and keep working. If you take the third route, the employer must either give reasonable notice that the terms are changing, or live with the terms you had; if it simply lets you keep working, you can insist on your original terms.

For most executives, the sensible path is to work under protest for a short, defined period, then decide. Think in days or a few weeks, not a quarter. Doing your job while objecting is different from refusing to report to the new boss. Do not refuse direct instructions, skip meetings or stop working. Refusing to work can be framed as insubordination or job abandonment. McKinley v. BC Tel, 2001 SCC 38 requires any finding of cause to be contextual and proportionate, but you do not want to hand your employer that argument.

There is also a mitigation trap. Under Evans v. Teamsters Local Union No. 31, 2008 SCC 20, a dismissed employee may be expected to reduce their losses by staying on with the same employer. That applies where the pay is the same, the working conditions are not substantially different, the work is not demeaning, and relationships are not acrimonious. For an executive placed under a rival, acrimony, humiliation and loss of status are usually the whole point, and your written record should say so in measured terms. See accepting a demotion to mitigate.

What is my package worth if this is a constructive dismissal?

Your damages are what you would have earned over a reasonable notice period, across every part of your package, unless a valid termination clause limits them. Reasonable notice depends on the factors in Bardal v. Globe & Mail Ltd., 1960 CanLII 294 (ON SC): the character of the employment, length of service, age, and how easily similar work can be found.

Senior roles attract longer notice because comparable jobs are scarce. In Love v. Acuity Investment Management Inc., 2011 ONCA 130, a senior vice president with only two and a half years of service received nine months' notice. The Court of Appeal cautioned against giving short service too much weight when the role and an equity stake make re-employment harder. At the other end, Lowndes v. Summit Ford Sales Ltd., 2006 CanLII 14 (ON CA) held that a base notice period above 24 months requires exceptional circumstances. See executive severance notice.

Each component is then tested against its own plan or contract wording:

Two more points matter here. First, in Lin v. Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan, 2016 ONCA 619, plan amendments adding forfeiture terms that the employees refused to sign never became part of their contracts. Check whether you ever accepted the version of the plan the company relies on (see plan amendments you never signed). Second, in Rahman v. Cannon Design Architecture Inc., 2022 ONCA 451, an executive's sophistication and independent legal advice did not save a termination clause that breached the ESA. Under Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391, one unlawful part voids the termination provisions as a whole. When a clause fails, Machtinger v. HOJ Industries Ltd., [1992] 1 SCR 986 restores common law reasonable notice. See is my termination clause enforceable.

How much does the length of the notice period change what I recover?

A great deal. The gap between "you resigned" and a properly measured notice period is often the biggest number in the file. The example below uses round figures for a vice president with exactly 10 years of service at an employer whose payroll exceeds $2.5 million. It assumes the bonus has paid out at target every year and the plan does not unambiguously exclude it. It also assumes the RSU wording is caught by the reasoning in Wigdor v. Facebook Canada Ltd., 2026 ONCA 572, a recent decision. Your own plans may give a different answer.

• Base salary: $260,000 a year ($5,000 a week).
• Target bonus: $100,000 a year.
• RSUs: $120,000 vesting each year, in quarterly tranches of $30,000.
• Employer pension contributions: $10,000 a year.
• Health, dental, life and disability benefits: $10,000 a year at replacement cost.

The severance figure shows s. 65(4) at work. The employer gave no notice, so the 8 weeks it owed are added to the executive's service, which adds one completed month. Severance becomes 10 and 1/12 weeks at $5,000, about $50,400, well under the 26-week cap in s. 65(5).

Compare the columns in pairs. The difference between 12 and 18 months is $250,000, which is why the Bardal factors, the scarcity of comparable roles and any inducement deserve careful argument. The difference between the resignation column and the 18-month column is $750,000, which is why the words you use this week matter more than anything else in this article. In a common law claim, the statutory amounts are generally counted toward the larger award rather than added on top of it. Earnings from a comparable new role during the notice period can reduce the common law figure, but not the ESA minimums (see the duty to mitigate).

Section 60 sits behind the ESA column. Section 60(1) says that during a statutory notice period the employer "(a) shall not reduce the employee's wage rate or alter any other term or condition of employment; (b) shall in each week pay the employee the wages the employee is entitled to receive, which in no case shall be less than his or her regular wages for a regular work week; and (c) shall continue to make whatever benefit plan contributions would be required to be made in order to maintain the employee's benefits under the plan until the end of the notice period." Section 60(2) uses the average of the previous 12 weeks for employees without a regular work week or not paid by time. Section 60(3) treats missed benefit contributions as unpaid wages, and s. 60(4) keeps any entitlement you have under the benefit plan itself.

In Wigdor v. Facebook Canada Ltd., 2026 ONCA 572, decided in August 2026, the court relied on s. 60(1)(a) to void clauses that end RSU vesting on termination. That is why an RSU tranche appears even in the minimum column. The decision is recent, and employers will test its limits. The same limb also means that if your employer answers your objection with working notice, it arguably cannot use the statutory notice weeks to impose the new reporting line or cut your bonus target.

Which words in my own documents decide the outcome?

The definitions, not the headings. Plans rarely say "we forfeit your equity if we demote you." They do it through how they define resignation, termination date, good reason and leaver status. Pull every document and look for these items:

• "Resignation" or "voluntary termination." Does it cover a resignation for good reason or a constructive dismissal, or only a resignation you freely chose? If every resignation is treated the same, how your exit is labelled decides whether you keep anything.
• "Good reason." Many executive agreements list a material reduction in title, authority, duties or reporting relationship as good reason. These clauses usually come with strict steps: written notice within a fixed number of days of the change, a period for the employer to fix it, and a resignation within a set window after that period ends. Miss a deadline and you may lose the benefit.
• "Good leaver" and "bad leaver." Good leaver usually covers termination without cause, death, disability and retirement, and sometimes good reason. Bad leaver usually covers resignation and cause. A demotion treated as a resignation moves you from one list to the other. See good leaver and bad leaver clauses.
• The vesting schedule. List every grant, its vesting dates and any performance conditions. The tranches that fall inside a 12, 18 or 24-month window drive the damages. See valuing equity vesting during the notice period.
• "Termination date" or "date services cease." Does it mean your last day worked, the day notice was given, or the end of any legally required notice period? Clear wording ending options on the date services ceased was enforced in Kieran v. Ingram Micro Inc., 2004 CanLII 4852 (ON CA). Wigdor v. Facebook Canada Ltd., 2026 ONCA 572, a recent decision, held clauses ending vesting on termination void because of s. 60(1)(a).
• Change of control. If the reorganization follows an acquisition or merger, check for single-trigger or double-trigger acceleration. A double-trigger clause often speeds up vesting if you are terminated without cause, or resign for good reason, within a protected window after the deal closes. Being demoted under a rival from the acquiring company is exactly the situation these clauses are written for.
• Clawbacks and repayment. Retention bonuses, sign-on bonuses and relocation packages often must be repaid if you resign voluntarily within a set period, and some incentive plans claw back awards already paid. See clawbacks of bonus and equity already paid.
• "Active employment" and "good standing" conditions in bonus plans. Andros v. Colliers Macaulay Nicolls Inc., 2019 ONCA 679 and Lin v. Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan, 2016 ONCA 619 held that such conditions do not bar damages.
• Pension and SERP documents: early retirement subsidies, bridge benefits, "active service" accrual wording, and any clause saying benefits cannot increase damages. See SERP and deferred compensation.
• Draft releases and separation agreements. A draft that says you "resigned" is not a neutral document, and signing it can give up the point worth the most. See should I sign a severance release.
• The termination clause in your employment agreement, including any "just cause" wording. Rahman v. Cannon Design Architecture Inc., 2022 ONCA 451 held that such wording can void the whole termination scheme.

What should I put in writing, and what should I avoid saying?

Put your objection in writing, say plainly that you are not resigning, and confirm that you remain ready and willing to do the role you hold. Keep it short, factual and calm. Your email is likely to be the first exhibit in any dispute, and a judge will read it looking for exactly the clarity your employer will claim you showed.

Put these in writing too, ideally the same day:

• Your own dated notes of the meeting: who attended, what was said about the promotion, the new reporting line and your package, and how you replied.
• A withdrawal of anything that could be read as a resignation, if you said something you regret.
• A request for the written terms of the new role, including title, reporting line, direct reports, bonus target and LTIP eligibility.
• If the employer later says you resigned, an immediate reply that you did not and that its position amounts to terminating your employment.

Avoid these:

• "I quit," "I resign," "I'm done here," or naming a last day.
• Farewell messages to your team, clients or LinkedIn network.
• Returning your laptop, phone or badge unless you are asked to.
• Refusing direct instructions, or skipping meetings with the new boss, while you decide.
• Forwarding confidential documents to a personal account. Keep copies of your own contract and plan documents that were given to you, and ask for anything else in writing.
• Signing an acknowledgment of the new organization chart or a revised offer letter without advice.
• Letting the "reasonable period" drift. ESA ss. 56(1)(b) and 63(1)(b) both require you to resign in response within a reasonable period, and staying too long under the new terms can be treated as accepting them at common law.

What documents should I gather, and what questions should I ask?

Gather everything that defines your role and your package before you decide anything. Then work through a short list of questions that will show a lawyer whether you have a constructive dismissal and what it is worth.

Documents to gather:

• Your offer letter, employment agreement and every amendment, including any you were asked to sign and did not.
• Every email, text, performance review or retention letter that records the promise of the promotion, with dates.
• The announcement or organization chart showing the new reporting line, and the old chart for comparison.
• Your job description, delegation of authority or signing limits, and committee memberships, before and after the change.
• The annual bonus plan for this year and the prior three years, and your payout history against target.
• Every equity grant agreement (RSUs, PSUs, options), the overall equity plan, and a current vesting schedule from the plan administrator.
• Deferred compensation, SERP and pension plan documents and your latest statements.
• Any change-of-control, retention, sign-on or relocation agreement, including repayment terms.
• Your benefits booklet, including life and long-term disability coverage and conversion rights.
• Any shareholders' agreement, if you bought shares.
• Your own meeting notes and every email since the announcement.

Questions to ask:

• Did I say or do anything a reasonable person would read as a settled decision to leave? If so, have I withdrawn it, and has the employer relied on it yet?
• Was the promotion promise specific and part of my bargain, or only a hope that was held out?
• Looked at objectively, what did I lose: rank, authority, direct reports, pay, bonus target, equity tier?
• Does any agreement define good reason, and what are its deadlines for notice, the employer's chance to fix things, and my resignation?
• How does each plan define resignation, termination date and good leaver, and did I ever accept the current version?
• Which tranches vest in the next 12, 18 and 24 months, and what are they worth today?
• Does my termination clause survive Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391 and Rahman v. Cannon Design Architecture Inc., 2022 ONCA 451?
• Is my employer provincially or federally regulated, and does its payroll meet the test in s. 64(1)(b)?
• Did a change of control happen recently enough to fall within a double-trigger protection window?

What should I do in the next seven days?

Protect the record first, then decide. The steps below keep every option open while you work out whether the change is serious enough to treat as a constructive dismissal.

1. 1.Today: send a short email confirming that you have not resigned, that you do not accept the change, and that you remain ready to work on your existing terms.
2. 2.Today: write dated notes of every conversation about the promotion and the new reporting line.
3. 3.Within two days: collect your contract, plan documents, grant agreements, vesting schedule and bonus history, from your own records or by written request.
4. 4.Within three days: check every agreement for good reason, change-of-control and clawback clauses, and put any notice or cure deadlines in your calendar.
5. 5.Keep working and follow reasonable instructions while you get advice. Do not refuse to deal with the new manager.
6. 6.Within a week: have an employment lawyer value the package across a realistic notice range and advise whether to accept, work under protest, or treat the change as a constructive dismissal. A severance pay review is a good place to start.
7. 7.Until you have that advice, do not sign any separation agreement, release or revised offer letter, and do not announce that you are leaving.

About the Author

Amir Mirza

Founder & Employment Lawyer, Mirza Law

Amir Mirza is the founder of Mirza Law and an Ontario employment lawyer acting for employees. He is licensed by the Law Society of Ontario and is a member of the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association. He writes about severance, wrongful dismissal, and the rights Ontario employees have when their job ends.

See all articles