Suing Your Disability Insurer for Bad Faith in Ontario
When a disability insurer denies a valid claim in bad faith, it can owe far more than the benefits. Ontario courts have awarded hundreds of thousands, and even millions, in extra damages.

Key takeaways
- Disability insurers owe you a duty of good faith in how they handle your claim.
- A bad-faith denial can add aggravated (mental-distress) damages on top of your benefits.
- Truly high-handed conduct can draw punitive damages meant to punish and deter the insurer.
- Ontario awards have reached $1.5 million in punitive damages against a disability insurer.
- Relying on cherry-picked surveillance or ignoring your doctors is classic bad faith.
In this article
When a disability insurer cuts off the benefits you paid for while you are too sick to work, it is not just a contract dispute. Insurers owe their policyholders a duty of good faith, and when they break it, Ontario courts have shown they will make them pay well beyond the benefits themselves. The extra damages can dwarf the claim.
✅Quick answer. Disability insurers owe a duty of good faith to handle claims fairly. When an insurer denies or terminates a valid claim in bad faith, you can recover the benefits plus aggravated damages for the mental distress it caused and, where the conduct is reprehensible, punitive damages to punish it. Ontario courts have awarded hundreds of thousands, and in one case 1.5 million dollars, in these extra damages. If your insurer is acting unfairly, this is worth pursuing, not accepting.
Do disability insurers owe you a duty of good faith?
Yes. An insurer cannot deny coverage or delay payment simply to take advantage of a claimant's financial vulnerability or to gain leverage in a settlement. It has to investigate fairly, weigh the medical evidence honestly, and pay valid claims. When it instead treats the claim as something to defeat, it breaches that duty, and the breach is a wrong the court can compensate and punish on its own, separate from the unpaid benefits.
What does insurer bad faith look like?
- Terminating benefits based on brief surveillance clips that show only light activity, while ignoring the full medical picture.
- Preferring a paper review by a contracted doctor over your treating physicians without good reason.
- Repeatedly denying benefits without warning or a fair explanation.
- Taking an adversarial stance from the very start of the claim.
- Cutting off a vulnerable, unwell claimant to pressure a cheap settlement.
Aggravated damages for the distress it causes
A wrongful denial hits people when they are least able to absorb it, and courts recognize that harm. In Lyons v. Canada Life Assurance Co. (2002 CanLII 18089), the court awarded 235,000 dollars in aggravated damages for the way the insurer handled a disability claim. These damages compensate for the mental distress, anxiety, and financial pressure a bad-faith denial inflicts, and they are separate from, and on top of, the benefits the insurer should have paid all along.
Punitive damages: when the insurer is punished
Where an insurer's conduct is truly high-handed, courts add punitive damages to denounce and deter it. In Fernandes v. Penncorp Life Insurance Company (2014 ONCA 615), the insurer terminated benefits based on surveillance showing only brief light activity, contradicting its own expert who supported total disability; the Court of Appeal upheld 200,000 dollars in punitive damages plus aggravated damages. And in Baker v. Blue Cross Life Insurance Company (2023 ONCA 842), where the insurer repeatedly denied benefits without warning and relied on flawed opinions from contracted physicians while ignoring the claimant's own doctors, the Court of Appeal upheld a striking 1.5 million dollars in punitive damages as necessary to deter systemic misconduct.
What drives the size of these awards?
The worse and more deliberate the conduct, the larger the award. Courts look at how reprehensible the insurer's behaviour was, how vulnerable the claimant was, whether the misconduct looks systemic rather than a one-off, and whether the insurer stood to profit from wrongly denying claims. A single administrative error is unlikely to attract punitive damages; a pattern of ignoring medical evidence and stonewalling a sick claimant is exactly what does.
What should you do if your insurer is acting in bad faith?
- 1.Keep every letter, form, and phone note, and a record of the medical evidence you sent and when.
- 2.Ask the insurer, in writing, to explain the specific medical basis for its decision.
- 3.Do not accept a lowball settlement offered while you are under financial pressure.
- 4.Get advice promptly. There are limitation deadlines, and a free review can assess both your benefits and a bad-faith claim.
A bad-faith claim usually rides on top of the fight for the benefits themselves, so start with your denied LTD claim and watch for the change from own occupation to any occupation, a common flashpoint. If the insurer is leaning on video, see how surveillance is actually used and challenged.
Frequently asked questions
Can I sue my disability insurer for bad faith in Ontario?
Yes. Insurers owe a duty of good faith, and a bad-faith denial can support aggravated damages for mental distress and punitive damages to punish the insurer, on top of the benefits owed. Ontario awards have reached into the hundreds of thousands and beyond.
How much can bad-faith damages against an insurer be?
They vary with the conduct. In Lyons v. Canada Life the court awarded 235,000 dollars in aggravated damages, in Fernandes v. Penncorp 200,000 dollars in punitive damages, and in Baker v. Blue Cross the Court of Appeal upheld 1.5 million dollars in punitive damages.
What counts as bad faith by a disability insurer?
Relying on brief surveillance while ignoring your full medical picture, preferring a contracted doctor's paper review over your treating physicians, repeated denials without warning, and cutting off a vulnerable claimant to force a cheap settlement are all classic examples.
Do I get bad-faith damages on top of my benefits?
Yes. Aggravated and punitive damages are separate from, and in addition to, the disability benefits the insurer should have paid. They compensate the distress caused and punish reprehensible conduct.

Omar Haddad
Legal Writer, Mirza Law
Omar Haddad is a legal writer at Mirza Law in Toronto. He writes about termination, medical and disability leave, and what the law protects when an employee is let go.
See all articles

